Science's War On Reason (The God Series Book 31) by Mike Hockney

Author:Mike Hockney [Hockney, Mike]
Language: eng
Format: mobi, pdf
Publisher: Hyperreality Books
Published: 2015-09-16T23:00:00+00:00

The Supernatural?

Science has committed the most catastrophic blunder in conceiving of anything outside “Nature” (i.e. the observable world) as “supernatural” (i.e. spooky, spiritual, religious, superstitious, absurd). Science has never understood the point Kant made so clearly: that there are phenomenal things (appearances), and noumenal things (things in themselves, without an appearance). The noumena are the phenomena stripped of the appearances (which have been projected onto them by our minds acting empirically). In other words, what lies beyond nature isn’t the absurd supernatural. Rather, what lies beyond the phenomenal world of science is the noumenal world of mathematics. There’s nothing spooky or religious about it. The world beyond science isn’t that of faith and speculation but of pure reason and logic. The world beyond empirical Content is that of rational Form.

It’s time for the idiotic notion that anything that cannot be verified via sensory experiments cannot therefore exist to be smashed to smithereens, to be exposed for the crazy superstition it is. It’s not the noumenal world that’s “religious”, it’s the phenomenal world of science with its puerile, anti-rational belief in the senses.

Science is an expression of the prejudice of sensing types that nothing non-sensory can exist. This has no rational basis. The only thing that saves science from being a religious superstition is non-sensory mathematics! Go figure.

*****

Metaphysics is regarded as speculative. It’s not. It’s hyperrationalist, hyper-logical ontological mathematics. Kant believed metaphysics should follow a rigorously defined procedure to prevent it going astray. This is guaranteed as soon as metaphysics is defined as ontological mathematics.

Kant believed that empirical knowledge is the solid basis for metaphysics. No, it’s not. Rational knowledge is the proper basis of metaphysics. Metaphysics should not follow the scientific method, but the mathematical method. Kant believed that experiences should be unified via abstract concepts. In fact, they should be unified by noumenal, ontological mathematics.

Experience

How many people have experienced being a genius? So, what’s the value of experience? How does experience teach you the secrets of ultimate existence? There are infinite experiences you haven’t had, so how can this narrow, stunted, limited, reducing-valve system of your personal experience be of any value whatsoever in understanding reality?

It nauseates us when we hear people saying that their subjective experiences trump objective reason. They are narcissists and egotists. Your experiences are more or less valueless as far as Truth goes. Luckily, we all have access to the objective, universal language that explains existence – ontological mathematics – so we have no reason to look to our experiences for any “knowledge” of existence.

Anti-Leibniz

Science is ferociously anti-Leibnizian, and always has been. No science paper has ever been written using Leibnizian rationalism and logic. No science paper has ever invoked rational and logical principles, such as those Leibniz formulated and relied on. Science at no time respects or uses the principle of sufficient reason, the defining principle of existence.

The whole way in which science is taught and conducted needs to radically change. Science must become rational, not empirical. Science and mathematics must merge, and that’s exactly what ontological mathematics accomplishes.

Download

Copyright Disclaimer:
This site does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. Please contact the content providers to delete copyright contents if any and email us, we'll remove relevant links or contents immediately.